美国人以惊人的速度互相射击欧美人们认为美国人愚蠢的十大原因在欧美人们认为美国人愚蠢的十大原因中排名第9名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

拥有武器的意义何在，为了自卫？！？！枪是用来杀戮和摧毁一个家庭的。恐怖分子杀人是完全错误的，但是开枪是因为你在自卫。没有枪的国家犯罪和杀人要少得多。我知道在美国有危险的人，他们大多是穷人，因为他们得不到钱因为他们的父母没有好好照顾他们的父母，或者他们的父母不关心他们的工作

What's the point of owning a weapon, to defend yourself?!?! Guns are used for killing and destroy a family. Terrorists killing people is completely wrong but shooting someone because your defending yourself. Countries without guns have way less crimes and killing being done. I know that there are dangerous people in the USA and their mostly poor people who are in need of money because they can't get a good job because the completely failed school because they didn't care, their parents didn't care or the parents just don't have enough money because they or their parents didn't care

···································································

如果你不继续修改你的宪法，而将破烂的耳环怪物扔进垃圾桶，那么你将不再有超过50%的国家高喊他们有“携带武器的权利”，而事实上，这是300多年前的事了，把全国步枪协会带到爱尔兰去，在那里他们可以随心所欲地美化枪支，并时不时地与爱尔兰共和军（IRA）进行一次交火，以保持每个人的目标都处于良好的状态。在美国抚养一个孩子，知道他或她有50%的机会在课堂上被枪杀，而这是在学校的头5年里，哪位家长会感到高兴呢，如果他们在前5年没有被杀，那么在学校的高年级被枪杀的几率会增加15%，在持枪家庭成员家中被枪杀的几率也会增加近100%……即使“我不知道他们是怎么找到我的枪的”。是的，你猜到了，我是凭空得出这些百分比的，但很遗憾，他们可能有点接近目标。你会继续说“改变”。从…开始改变吧

If, instead of continually amending your constitution you would instead bin the rag-earred monster then you would no longer have over 50% of your country shouting they have "the right to bear arms", when in fact, that was so over 300 years ago. Then, see the NRA off to Ireland where they can glorify guns all they want to and have a bit of a shoot-out with the IRA now and again to keep everybody's aim in good nick. What parent can feel good about rearing a child in the US knowing he or she has a 50% chance of being shot in class (and that is during the first 5 years of school), an additional 15% chance of being shot in upper levels of school (if they weren't killed the during first 5 years), and nearly 100% chance of being shot in the home of a gun-owning family member...even if "I don't know how they found my gun". Yes, you guessed it, I'm pulling those percentages out of thin air but sadly, they are probably somewhat close to the mark. You lot go on about "change"...start changing at ... more

···································································

我十四岁的时候买了把枪，但…我不认为这是个好主意。尽管我非常喜欢它，但我不希望拥有枪支的权利被人滥用。见鬼，我希望拥有枪支的权利只用于职业目的，而不是那些只想看起来很酷的平民。看看发生了什么。几年前，大约有20个孩子我们学校中枪了。另外，以前每个人都取笑我，也取笑学校里的这个孤独的孩子，因为其他人都有自己的枪。即使我的手指第一次扣动扳机，我仍然认为拥有枪并不是必要的

I got myself a gun when I was fourteen but...I don't think that's a good idea.As much as I really love it, I don't want gun ownership rights to be abused by people. Hell, I wish gun ownership was only used for professional purposes, not for random civilians who just want to look cool.Look what happened. A few years ago, about 20 kids in our school got shot. Plus, everyone used to tease me and also this lone kid back at school because everyone else has a gun of their own.Even if my finger will land itself on the trigger for the first time, I still think gun ownership isn't really necessary.

···································································

我首先想到的是枪支拥有率很高，但我不得不改变这一点，因为真正的问题不是枪支拥有。还有一些国家的武装程度甚至超过了美国。问题是，除了那些积极参与战争、毒品战争的国家外，美国人对彼此使用枪支的次数比其他任何国家都多。即便如此这只是问题的一部分。人们互相射击是愚蠢的。美国人不顾一切理由和理由坚持认为枪支可以保护他们的安全，是上帝赋予他们的权利，这是另一部分

I first had the high rate of gun ownership here, but had to change that because it is not gun ownership that is really the issue. There are other countries that are even more armed than the US. The issue is that Americans use those guns on each other more than any other countries save those actively at war (counting drug wars).And even that is only a part of the problem. People shooting each other is stupid. Americans who insist in defiance of all reason and rationale that guns keep them safe and are a God given right are the other part.

···································································

我对美国有一点不了解，我是加拿大人，虽然我认为我们的国家是世界上最好的榜样，我已经访问过美国好几次了，我很欣赏你和你的几代人在你之前建造的东西。我的问题是：如果你期望每一个公民都能为个人和国防的目的而武装，并且这些武器与你的武装部队相当，那你为什么还需要你的武装部队呢？这不是他们的工作吗？在我看来，作为一个简单的加拿大人，NRA在你们的宪法中提到的修正案，是在一个非常真实的威胁，即大英帝国将要“卷土重来”的时候起草的，武装民兵随时准备战斗的必要性是有道理的。300年的时间不分先后，我敢肯定……更多

The one thing I don't understand about America, and I say this with all affection, because I love your country and your people. I am Canadian, and although I think our country is the best model to follow in the world, I have visited America several times and can appreciate what you and the generations before you have built. My question is this: if you expect every single citizen to be armed for the purpose of personal and national defense, and for those arms to be equivilant to those available to your armed forces---why do you need your armed forces at all? Isn't that their job? It seems to me (a simple Canadian) that the amendments to which the NRA refers to in your constitution were written and intended for a time when there was a very real threat that the British Empire was going to "come back". When taken in this context, the need for armed militia's ready to fight at moments notice makes sense. 300 years (give or take) pass, and just speaking for myself here, I'm pretty sure that ... more

···································································

是的，我同意。我不想这么说，但有些美国人有很多机会获得枪支和火器。宪法制定时，只有步枪和灵长类枪支。这意味着你不能，我不知道，走进同性恋夜总会，射杀50多人！咳嗽对不起，我有点疯了！哈哈。我的家人反对枪械，希望能有更安全的政策。从我5岁起，他们总是说，如果我在朋友家看到枪，我本来要打电话回家，然后被立即接走的。我们家里没有玩弄死亡机器的。很遗憾，有些人受的伤太大了，他们会杀了一些人，有时甚至是自己！我简直不敢相信！

Yeah... I can agree with that. I hate to say it but some Americans have to much access to guns and fire arms. When the constitution was written, there were only riffles and very primative guns around. This meant that you couldn't, I don't know, WALK INTO A GAY NIGHT CLUB AND SHOOT OVER 50 PEOPLE! *Cough* Sorry, I went a little crazy there! Lol. My family is against fire arms and want more secure policies on them. From the time I was 5, they always said that if I ever was at a friends house and saw a gun, I was to call home and get picked up amediatly. We don't kid around with death machines in my family. It's sad that some people are hurt enough that they will kill inocent people and sometimes themselves! I just can't believe it!

···································································

自从他们的宪法第二修正案以来，美国人就不想用枪来控制他们的生活了。他们也不想用枪来控制他们的生活，因为他们不想用枪来控制他们介绍。哦，还有全国步枪协会的宣传，共和党人和愚蠢的美国人只是盲目地跟随。他们有他们的幻想，如果每个人都有枪，那么枪击案将如何进行：如果一个坏人走进银行，说“所有人都趴在地上”，那么所有的“好人”都掏出枪说“不，你趴在地上”。这太血腥了可笑。美国人对他们自己的政府如此恐惧，他们觉得拥有Ak-47可以保护他们免受无人机和坦克暴君的袭击。没有一件事能阻止另一个桑迪胡克事件发生，看看几天前发生的奥兰多枪击案。全国步枪协会是如此愚蠢，以至于……更多

Americans are so obsessed with their constitution that they worship their second Amendment when shootings occur on a regular basis. They also have the stupidest reasons for not wanting gun control like "Gun's don't kill people. People kill people." Yet when you look at Australia (where I live) we haven't a mass shooting since gun control was introduced. Oh and the NRA's propaganda that Republicans and dumb Americans just follow blindly. They have their fantasies of how if everyone had guns then how shootings would play out: If a bad guy walks into a bank and says "everyone on the ground", then all the "good guys" pull out their guns and say "NO you get on the floor". It's bloody ludicrous. And Americans are so fearful of their own government they feel that by having an Ak-47 will protect them from a tyrant with drones and tanks. Not one thing has been done to prevent another Sandy Hook from occuring and look what happened a few days ago, the Orlando shooting. The NRA is so stupid that ... more

···································································

太对了。任何一场战斗都会导致暴力，最终有人受伤或死亡。他们中的很多人似乎都在用它来威胁人们得到他们想要的东西。目的是为了确保安全，看到特权被滥用真的很难过。我想政府应该忽视这一点，或者至少在处理枪支的问题上更严格一些，让规定更加严格。你不知道他们能用它做什么。整个“生意就是生意”就是废话。所以你是说为了钱你会让无辜的旁观者被杀？Pfft公司

Too true. Any fight can lead to violence and someone ends up getting injured or kill in the process. It seems like a lot of them are using it to threaten people to get what they want. The purpose is to ensure safety and it's really sad to see that priviledge being abused. I think the government should overlook this, or at least be more strict as to make the rules more strict when it comes to handing guns. You don't know what they can do with it. The whole "business is business" is bs. So you're saying that you'd let innocent bystanders get killed for the sake of money? Pfft.

···································································

那么，这把枪是从哪里来的呢？那些只去过美国的人看了新闻，认为出去走都不安全，这听起来像是一个孩子听到他爸爸说床下有怪物后会做的事情。我同意美国有问题，但我们每4到8个小时就会收到同一个人的复写本这些年使改变变得如此困难以至于你开始习惯成为一个不同国家的人所说的堕落者

So where did this gun thing even come from people that have only visited america read the news and think that it's not even safe to walk outside which sounds like something a kid would do after hearing it from his dad that monsters were under the bed I agree america has problems but we keep getting carbon copy's of the same people every 4 to 8 years which makes it hard for change so hard you start to get used to being a what other people from different countries call degenerates

···································································

有些人不知道，我们之所以有枪，是因为约翰·洛克，一个思想对我国自然权利、君主立宪制、人权法案等产生了重大影响的人，是因为如果政府侵犯或试图撤销我们的权利，我们可以引用我的历史老师的话，“干掉政府”。这也是为了保护。然而，好的也有坏的。罪犯经常利用这一权利来伤害人

Some people don't know that the reason why we have guns is that John Locke, a man whose thinking influenced our country greatly (natural rights, constitutional monarchy, bill of rights, etc.), is because if the government ever violated or tried to revoke our rights, we can, quoting from my History teacher, "take out the government." This is also for protection. However, with the good, comes the bad. Criminals often take advantage of this right to harm people.