拿破仑波拿巴欧美历届十大军事将领在欧美历届十大军事将领中排名第6名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

让我们来比较一下亚历山大大帝或成吉思汗拿破仑。亚历山大大帝比大多数他的敌人,他最好的军队。是的,亚历克斯很好,我会得到我为什么喜欢拿破仑。汗的情况下,没有人准备好了。欧洲忙于相互战争和其他人没有准备与汗的暴行。在拿破仑的情况下,他惊喜的元素后,他宣称自己并且。他们知道之后会发生什么,和每个人都反对拿破仑。甚至整个欧洲对他,他还是赢了。不是狡猾地,但是方式。他唯一的错误是入侵俄罗斯像希特勒一样。幸存的不到十年在他的铁拳的欧洲,一个人除了拿破仑不能独自做我觉得应该给他

Let's compare Alexander the Great or Ghengis Khan to Napoleon. Alexander the Great outnumbered most of his enemies, and he had better troops. Yes, Alex was very good, and I'll get to why I favored Napoleon. In Khan's situation, no one was ready. Europe was busy at war with each other and everyone else wasn't prepared with the Khan's brutality. In Napoleon's case, he had the element of suprise after he declared himself l'empereur. They knew what to expect afterwards, and EVERYONE was against Napoleon. Even with entire Europe against him, he still won. Not slimly, but but by a ways. His only mistake was invading Russia as Hitler did. Surviving a little less than decade with all of Europe in his iron fist that one man (except Napoleon) could not do alone I think should give him the #1 spot. This says he wasn't just the best tactician to ever live, but also an astute leader like Julius Caesar.

···································································

拿破仑经常战斗寡不敌众,整个文明大陆反对他。他发明了许多新军事战略甚至公制,所有这一切使他的胜利。他的缺陷,他不希望俄罗斯烧毁自己的资本来阻止他,然而他们所做的。

Napoleon often fought outnumbered, and had an entire civilized continent against him. He invented many new military strategies and even the Metric System, all of which led him to victory. His flaw was that he didn't expect the Russians to burn down their own capital to stop him, yet they did.

···································································

让我们诚实的面对自己,亚历山大大帝征服整个欧洲即使与欧洲其他国家。不。即使是凯撒可以胜任这个角色。现在我表达我的敬意,他们是由于,别误会我;亚历克斯和凯撒都是伟大的,但拿破仑是一个全新的水平。

Let's be honest with ourselves. Did Alexander the Great conquer all of Europe even when battling literally the rest of Europe. No. Not even Caesar could pull that off. Now I pay my respects where they are due, and don't get me wrong; Alex and Caesar are great and all, but Napoleon is on a whole new level.

···································································

首先至少把他的名字拼对。他是一个庄严的图的神奇魅力和军事天才使他胜利胜利后在欧洲大陆,并在埃及。他是亚历山大大帝的时间,现代凯撒,也没有能反对他。他伟大的缺陷,最终导致了他的失败是他相信自己的无敌,这源于先前的军事胜利,他won.Napoleon无疑比坏更有利于世界。许多人都说他是个暴君和军事独裁者,在某些方面他。不过他是法国大革命的化身。他建立一个帝国,但同时他是传播的理想自由,平等,和兄弟情谊,培育出了法国大革命,他释放了被奴役人民在克罗地亚和波兰,波兰的国歌中提到他的名字,写了一个法律的代码仍然与法国这一天,而且是…更多

First of all at least spell his first name right... He was a godlike figure whose amazing charisma and military genius brought him victory after victory on the European continent, and in Egypt. He was the Alexander the Great of his time, the modern Caesar, and none could stand against him. His great flaw that ultimately led to his defeat was his belief in his own invincibility, that grew out of previous military victories that he had won.Napoleon has certainly done much more good for the world than bad. Many people label him a tyrant and military dictator, and in some ways he was. However he was the embodiment of the French Revolution. He was building an empire, but at the same time he was spreading the ideals of liberty, equality, and brotherhood, bred out of the French Revolution. He freed enslaved peoples in Croatia and Poland (so much that his name is mentioned in the Polish national anthem) and wrote a law code that remains with France to this day, and is the base for ... more

···································································

这个人是最伟大的,手下来。他一直比他在战斗和许多仍然拆除他的敌人在奥斯特利茨战役。他在60总过战场,只有失去了八。只有八。和他只输了2决定性战役。虽然他可能没有征服了有史以来最土地或建最强大的帝国,他100�0最好的军队。许多将军甚至可能有一个或2奇迹击败他们的对手当他们超过如果他们幸运的话。它是拿破仑一样不断地挑选一块干草的干草堆栈只有一个针。他。它了,他非常自信,他故意让自己在入侵的一个主要城市。数量,仍赢。莱比锡和滑铁卢奇迹第六第七联盟。地狱,他连续赢得了五次战争. .反对一些国家联合起来。毫无疑问,他是最好的将军…更多

This man was simply the greatest of all time, hands down. He was constantly outnumbered in his battles and many he still demolished his foe in (like the Battle of Austerlitz). He fought in 60 total battles, and only lost eight of them. Only eight. And he only lost 2 Decisive battles. Although he may not have conquered the most land ever or built the strongest empire ever, he was 100% the best on the military. Many generals may have one or even 2 miracles where they defeat their foe while they were outnumber (if they were lucky). Napoleon did it as constantly as picking a piece of hay out of a hay stack with only one needle. Over and over he did it. It got to the point where he was so confident that he purposely make himself outnumbered in invading a major city... and still win. Leipzig and Waterloo were miracles for the Sixth and Seventh Coalition. Hell, he won five wars... in a row against a bunch of nations banded together. There is no doubting that he is the best general that has ... more

···································································

我很惊讶Arthur Wellesley并不在这个名单上。而我相信历史上有几个将军韦尔斯利被人能够击败拿破仑给许多尝试和合适的条件下,我不认为还有一个谁能反对他的纯粹的可能。他把每一个欧洲国王自己的膝盖,他们都只是在一个巨大的拳头。+ + u2018babies u2018人们说他是一个暴君,但他反对国王的想法,害怕欧洲统治者,法国是第一个现代欧洲共和国和他们必须杀死他的理想。在所有的年龄,可能没有一个人能够和拿破仑站脚趾到脚,一直打他。

I'm surprised Arthur Wellesley isn't on this list. While I do believe that there are a few Generals in history (Wellesley being one) who could defeat Napoleon given many tries and the right conditions, I cannot think that there is even one out there who could stand against his sheer might. He brought every King in Europe to their knees, they were all just "babies in the fists of a giant." People say he was a tyrant, but he fought against the idea of a King, and this scared European rulers, for France was the first modern European republic and they had to kill him for his ideals. In all the ages, there isn't likely to be a man who will be able to stand toe to toe with Napoleon and beat him consistently.

Napoleon's remarkable personality was one key to his influence. Above all he inspired his men, for he inspired confidence from privates to field marshals. His opponents learned from Napoleon's innovations. Napoleon was responsible for spreading the values of the French Revolution to other countries, especially in legal reform and the abolition of serfdom. Napoleon was imprisoned Saint Helena in exile by the British, a tropical island of volcanic origin in the South Atlantic Ocean and One of the most isolated islands in the world.

···································································

我在5。到底有谁找到成吉思汗的选票这个东西?成吉思汗是5,因为他可以看出发达还是丝毫不懂加略山的最高水平。直到纳粹闪电战将一支蒙古人一样那么快。成吉思汗愿意采取一切必要措施实现胜利。费恩撤退,是骑士精神的完美的策略。我相信他会一直停在FranceGermany,或意大利军队的神圣罗马帝国皇帝,由于无法保护补给线和装甲。

I got genghis at 5. Who in the hell votes for this stuff? Genghis is 5 because he developed calvary on the highest level it can be seen.. Not until the Nazi blitzkrieg would an army move so fast as the mongols did. Genghis was willing to do what was necessary to achieve victory. The feined retreat, was the perfect strategy in the have of chivalry.. I do believe that he'd have been stopped in FranceGermany, or Italy by the armies of the holy roman emperor, due to the inability to keep supply lines open and armour..

···································································

只是一个泰坦的军事历史。他的敌人和他的盟友都敬畏他的勇气和才华。当然,他失去了战斗,但一个伟大的将军不是战斗他失去了判断,但他不该赢的战争,拿破仑从第一天开始他的军旅生涯无视odds.Maybe最伟大的战士。

Simply a titan of military history. His enemies like his allies were all in awe of his boldness and talent. Sure, he lost battles, but a great general is not judged on the battles he lost, but the battles he shouldn't have won. And Napoleon from day one of his military career defied the odds.Maybe the greatest soldier of all time.

···································································

人们叫拿破仑一个暴君,但是如果你知道你的历史很明显他反对联盟的战争主要是防御战争。欧洲君主国并没有善待的思想自由和精英,这就是为什么奥地利、俄罗斯,其余资金由英国,继续攻击法国直到拿破仑推翻,把拿破仑和希特勒是不公平的。

People call Napoleon a tyrant but if you know your history it's clear the wars he fought against the coalitions were mostly defensive wars. The European monarchies did not take kindly to the ideas of liberty and meritocracy and that's why Austria, Russia and the rest, bankrolled by Great Britain, continued attacking France until Napoleon was deposed. It is unfair to compare Napoleon to Hitler.