汉尼拔巴萨(Hannibal Barca)——欧美历届十大军事将领

汉尼拔巴萨(Hannibal Barca)——欧美历届十大军事将领在《欧美历届十大军事将领》中排名第4名。我们精选了部分网友观点： ...

汉尼拔巴萨欧美历届十大军事将领在欧美历届十大军事将领中排名第4名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

辉煌。战斗之锐气是一个杰作。一旦被困在一个山谷晚上大罗马部队由欺骗了罗马人误以为他要收取他们把火把牛并送出谷向罗马。罗马人带着他们的所有军队的地方他们认为他尝试突破,他离开了山谷的路线他们刚刚离开打开他搬到帮助他们的朋友。Trasimene湖是一块神奇的欺骗。当他的人几乎击败罗马,他也是伪造的人在我们记住它的帝国战争的火灾。他们学习的策略,从他给了他们一个帝国。

Brilliant general. Battle of Cannae was a masterpiece. Once was trapped in a valley at night by a larger Roman force got out by tricking the Romans into thinking he was going to charge them by tying torches to oxen and sending them out the valley towards the Romans. Romans brought all their troops to the place they thought he was about to try break through while he left the valley by a route they had just left open to him as they moved to help their friends. Battle of Lake Trasimene was a amazing piece of deception. While he was the man who almost beat Rome, he was also the one who forged it in to the empire we remember it as in the fires of his war with them. They learnt the tactics that gave them an empire from him.

···································································

看我的朋友。当你不知道的东西…不赖特废话一些微牛不是cannea. cannea之战是在巴勒塔附近,汉尼拔大地是平的,这样可以在包络和cavallery manuvre罗马罗马军团的支持。请在你赖特一些东西. .做一个小研究。再见

Look my friends... When you don't know something... Don't wright nonsense the one whit oxen was not the battle of cannea. the battle of cannea was near barletta and the land was flat so that hannibal could manuvre the roman in to a envelopment and cavallery to back of the roman legion... Please before you wright some thing... Do a small reaserch. Ciao

···································································

这个天才战胜强大的罗马帝国后获得了胜利。作为一个军事一般不等于这个人。他应该在列表的顶部,结合各种不同种族的战士成一个特级和有效的军队。他充分利用地形和伏击。他研究他的对手,因此知道他的敌人之前接触他们。以上一切他的战术使他赢得战斗。这家伙是爱因斯坦的军事战争。如果孙子当时战争的作家圣经汉尼拔巴萨就是耶稣基督。他能消灭整个军队。如果系统在迦太基是由类似于罗马帝国没有什么能够阻止汉尼拔巴萨。唯一阻止汉尼拔是缺乏支持他迦太基。一个刚刚调查他的战役之一,每个人都同意,他应该在这个列表。

This genius gained victory after victory against the mighty Roman Empire. As a military general none is equal to this man. He should be on top of the list. He combined various warriors from different races into one superieur and effective army. He made good use of terrain and laid ambushes. He studies his adversaries and thus knew his enemies before engaging them. Above everything else his tactics made him win battles. This guy is the Einstein of military warfare. If Sun Tzu was the writer of the War Bible then Hannibal Barca is Jesus Christ. He was capable of annihilating entire armies. If the system in Carthage was comprised similar to the Roman Empire then nothing would be able to stop Hannibal Barca. The only thing that stopped Hannibal was the lack of support he had from Carthage. One has just to look into one of his battles and everyone will agree that he should be on top of this list.

···································································

汉尼拔是这样一个杰出的领导人,甚至在他死了之后,罗马是害怕迦太基上升回到突出。实际上,罗马不仅觉得需要入侵,打败他们,燃烧他们的城市,它的地面上,我的意思是实际拆除所有建筑物——但他们甚至那么咸地球它是建立在这样可以建造任何东西。诚然,成吉思汗很好,建立了一个伟大的帝国,但那是由于蒙古人自己的战斗风格,敌人无法承受打击和运行与后弯的弓马弓箭手. .这是有点像征服者的枪干掉阿兹特克人只使用石头骨+ +++磨木制武器与疾病和枪和马被Europeans.This传入美洲,上面的那个家伙在山与大象游行,在得到他的工程师们建造筏带他们和他的军队包括大象…更多

Hannibal was such a brilliant leader that even after he died, Rome was scared of Carthage rising back to prominence. To the point that Rome actually felt the need to not only invade, beat them, burn their city, tear it to the ground literally - by which I mean actually dismantle all buildings - but they then even salted the earth it was built upon so that nothing could be built there again. Admittedly, Genghis Khan was good, built a great empire, BUT that was due to the fighting style of the mongols themselves, their enemies couldn't withstand the hit and run horse bowmen with recurved bows...it was kind of like the Conquistadors with their guns taking out the Aztecs (who only used stone/ bone/ sharpened wooden weapons) with disease and guns and horses (which were introduced to the Americas by Europeans).This, on top of the fact that the guy marched over mountains with elephants, after getting his engineers to build rafts to take them and his army (including the elephants) ... more

···································································

汉尼拔Barka将永远被铭记的人带来了罗马。这样的壮举很少被重复,甚至和我的很多朋友从来没有听说过迦太基如果不是他。每一次战斗,罗马人有优势,数字,地形,你名字,罗马人。但是有一件事他们没有汉尼拔,他被击败了,这是真的。但正如我所说,罗马仍然有优势。将军打了他没有击败他纯粹的军事技能的汉尼拔。

Hannibal Barka will forever be remembered as the man who brought Rome to its knees. Such a feat has seldom been repeated, and many of my friends would never have even heard of Carthage were it not for him. Every battle he fought, the Romans had every advantage, numbers, terrain, you name it, the Romans had it. But the one thing they didn't have was Hannibal. He was, defeated, it's true. But as I said, Rome still had every advantage. The general who beat him did not beat him purely out of military skill the way Hannibal did.

···································································

记住,罗马从未放弃…Cartchage defit和他们surrended.And记得第一次迦太基战争…迦太基supirior海军warsshipAnd他们失去了…你说一些之前请研究

Remember that rome never surrended...Cartchage one defit and they surrended.And remember the first punic war... Carthage had supirior naval warsshipAnd they lost... Please study before you say somthing

Rome had not advandeged

···································································

我friendsCarthage之前已经知道汉尼拔,奥斯陆更强大的罗马

My friendsCarthage was already known before Hannibal and was olso more powerful of Rome

···································································

汉尼拔将军击败罗马人与他们优越的数字和技术不是一次两次,但三大战役第二次布匿战争期间,他的能力将他的军队在一起作为一个战斗力量的竞争对手甚至成型的斯巴达人,是什么让他的成就他的单位是一个战斗力量是他们来自西班牙和迦太基。尽管他最终打败了罗马的值得注意的是,罗马,打败他的儿子第一个罗马的失败后,他打败了。他的父亲西皮奥非洲花了剩下的战争研究和学习汉尼拔的策略。汉尼拔可能没有扩大了迦太基帝国像亚历山大大帝一样马其顿的屁股他的军事思想在战场上步枪在历史上。

General Hannibal defeated the Romans with their Superior numbers and Technology not once not twice but three major battles during the Second Punic War. His ability to integrate his troops together as one fighting force Rivals that of even the Spartans. What makes his accomplishments of molding his unit to be one fighting force is the fact that they came from all over Spain and Carthage. Even though his eventual defeat came at the hands of a Roman it is worth noting that the Roman that beat him was the son of the first Roman he defeated. After the defeat of his father Scipio Africanus spent the rest of the war studying and learning Hannibal's tactics. Hannibal may not have expanded the Empire of Carthage the way Alexander the Great did Macedonia butt his military mind on the field of battle is on rifle throughout history.

···································································

汉尼拔在3。接着你可以辩论汉尼拔在凯撒但没有其他人。他杀了30 40000 trebia河。这就是毁灭这个词来源。然后他杀死15 20 k aat湖tresamine。如果你看看ticinus河之战,3战,一个接一个发生,你有这些3学习策略。反击,双包络,伏击。他杀死比你像美国人在越南,10到1。什么对我来说有趣的是,杀死比如,历史学家可以称之为拙劣的运动。我知道它是一个主键征服一个民族一旦入侵。杀死比高id求同存异。

I got hannibal at 3.. Come on.. you can maybe debate hannibal over caesar but no one else.. He killed 30 out of 40,000 at the trebia river.. That's where the word annihilation comes from. Then he kills 15 out of 20k aat lake tresamine. If you look at the battle of the ticinus river, in 3 battles, that occured one after another, you have these 3 tactics to learn. The counter attack, the double envelopment, and the ambush. His kill ratio was somethin like the Americans had in Vietnam,10 to 1. Whats funny to me is that with a kill ratio such as that, that historians can call it a botched campaign.. I understand that its is a primary key to all out conquer a peoples once you invade. With a kill ratio that high id agree to disagree..