M14型(M14)——欧美十佳突击步枪

M14型(M14)——欧美十佳突击步枪在《欧美十佳突击步枪》中排名第13名。我们精选了部分网友观点： ...

型欧美十佳突击步枪在欧美十佳突击步枪中排名第13名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

M14是一个相当沉重的步枪但不是相当强劲的男性.我把一个在67 \ / 68年在越南和感激我发布最好的半自动步枪.它非常准确和在伊拉克被用作狙击步枪.它至少是一样耐用其他突击步枪和7.62圆是一个远程杀手.没有\ u2018fragile \ u2018 M14部分.这是提高\ u2018son \ u2018 M1,乔治·巴顿的步枪叫\ u2018the最好战斗实现设计.\ u2018 FN歧视与香港产品G36也非常好,但是如果一个人需要一个步枪能够执行在所有天气和地形,丛林或开放田地和山,我仍然会选择M14 !民用版标准作为M14 M1A本质上是相同的除了它只能半自动开火,但斯普林菲尔德也使得一个国家匹配和超级匹配M1A.我拥有M1A超级比赛,我永远不会放弃这个步枪!

The M14 is a fairly heavy rifle but not for any reasonably strong male. I carried one in '67/'68 in Vietnam and am thankful I was issued the best semi auto rifle available. It is extremely accurate and was used as a sniper rifle in Iraq. It is at least as durable as any other assault rifle and the 7.62 round is a long range killer round. There are no "fragile" parts on the M14. It is the IMPROVED "son" of the M1, the rifle that George Patton called "the finest battle implement ever devised." The FN FAL is also very good as is the HK G36, but if one needs a rifle able to perform well in all weather and terrain, jungle or open fields and mountains, I would still choose the M14! The civilian version (the standard M1A) is essentially the same as an M14 except it can only fire on semi-auto but Springfield also makes a national match and super match M1A. I own a M1A super match and I would never part with this rifle! I carried an M14 many, many years ago, but I also now own at present an AR-15, AR-10, FN-FAL, AK-47, SIG 556, FN-SCAR, M1A, HK-91, M1 Carbine, and an M1 Garand. When I was young, the M14 was no problem. At the present time it is way too heavy, but it is still a wonderful rifle that never fails you and is extremely accurate.If I had to buck one around now, I would choose the SCAR in 5.56. First weapon I trained with in USMC trained on 500 meter course. in Vietnam only rifle I would carry could hit consistently out ot 800 meters with open sights, gotta agree the punch and range were worth the weight. cxivilian model lacks the properly headspaced bolt (matched to the specific rifle ) ( sereial # on bolt same as sereial # on rifle without this it wasent as accurate also civilian version doesn't normally come with milspec barrel, maby 10 % of manufactured barrels were good enough for USMC M-14 civbilian version any barrel would do, or not do if you get my meaning. Mill spec parts make a huge diference my opinion. An excellent, reliable battle rifle. Proven in combat. Never should have been replaced by the m16.It certainly qualifies, by any objective standard, as among the top 5 or 6 "best battle rifles" on earth.

···································································

我进行一个M14很多年前,但现在我也自己目前ar - 15, AR-10, FN-FAL, ak - 47,团体556年FN-SCAR, M1A, hk - 91, M1卡宾枪,M1加仑。当我年轻的时候,M14是没问题。目前它太重了,但它仍然是一个美妙的步枪,总是你和非常准确。如果我现在巴克一约,我会选择5.56的疤痕。

···································································

我第一武器训练与装备的训练在500米租赁越南只步枪我将可能达到一致与开放的景点,ot 800米得同意打孔和范围是值得的。cxivilian模型缺乏适当的顶部空间螺栓匹配特定的步枪sereial

···································································

一个优秀的、可靠的战斗步枪。在战斗中证明。不应该被取代m16。当然合格,任何客观标准,跻身前5或6 \ u2018best战斗步枪\ u2018在地球上。

···································································

耐用,高度精确的武器,与新股票可以适合所有的附件请您加上触发7.62北约,最好的突击步枪子弹

···································································

非常准确和可靠+最好是强大的步枪的AJ很重但不坏基本上取代,因为它太好一般问题

···································································

基于m - 1加仑,这是现代步枪的鼻祖。M-39今天使用,这不仅步枪包一拳,但非常准确。

···································································

小斗牛式导弹短版的M14。但是所有的武器好双方从原始。加上许多附件rails和高流动性由于小斗牛式导弹的设计。