审查制度(Censorship)——欧美十大禁忌

审查制度(Censorship)——欧美十大禁忌在《欧美十大禁忌》中排名第12名。我们精选了部分网友观点： ...

审查制度欧美十大禁忌在欧美十大禁忌中排名第12名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

他们应该禁止儿童读物和电影中的冒犯性内容，因为即使作者在表达自己的观点，也没有必要在儿童读物和电影中说这种东西，现在是美国限制言论自由权的时候了。我不在乎美国是否会成为一个民主国家。几乎所有国家都限制他们的言论自由权，甚至加拿大也这样做

They should ban offensive content in children's books and movies because there is no need for the author to say that kind of stuff in children's books and movies even if he is expressing his opinions.Also, it's time for America to limit it's rights of freedom of speech. I don't care if America will not become a democracy. Almost all countries limit their rights of freedom of speech. Even Canada does it.

···································································

我不同意谁把这个列在名单上。因为如果一个孩子在看一个骂人的节目呢？然后它审查。然后至少没有听到整个词！但是家长们仍然可以改变频道，因为没有审查制度，全世界的孩子们都会从歌曲或不恰当的节目中学会咒骂！

I disagree whoever put this on the list. Because what if a kid is watching a cussing show? Then it censors. Then at least has not hear the whole word! But the parents can still change the channel because without censorship kids ALL over the world will learn cussing from songs or inappropriate shows!

···································································

哦，听着，自由法西斯主义者正试图审查那些与他们不一致的观点。烧书？移除杰斐逊·戴维斯的雕像？作为一个社会，你不能通过从历史中删除“冒犯性”的东西来成长，你要用这些东西来吸取教训：重蹈覆辙是多么危险

Oh look, liberal fascists are trying to censor opinions that don't agree with their own. Book burning? Removing a statue of Jefferson Davis? You don't grow as a society by removing "offensive" stuff from history, you use them to learn a lesson about how dangerous it is to repeat the past.

···································································

真的-博尔特斯根德

so true - boltslegend

···································································

作为一个有点倾向于政治派别左派的人，我完全同意

As someone who leans a little bit towards the left side of the political spectrum, I couldn't agree more. - Atham

···································································

我部分同意。强制审查应该被禁止，因为它违反了第一修正案，但自我审查不应该，因为它给了一个选择，如果某事应该说或不说。—希波金

I agree, partially. Forced censorship should be banned as it violates the first amendment, but self-censorship shouldn't, as it gives a choice if something should be said or not. - hippoking

···································································

自我审查是一回事，但是破坏娱乐业的审查是不好的，是的，它是一个令人讨厌的问题现在禁止的东西只是因为你不同意它是可怕的，你的独裁者比希特勒-普西鲁夫更糟糕

Self censorship is one thing but censorship that ruins entertainment is no good yes its one annoying problem now banning things just cause you don't agree with it is terrible you dictators are worse than hitler - Psyluv

···································································

审查制度应该只适用于“残疾人”，因为他们可能会被毫无疑问的事实/不需要的事实所冒犯，而动物也不会理解。如果你很出色的话，指的是狗和大象

Censorship should be for "disabled" people only because they may get offended by the unquestionable truth/unwanted truth and animals would not understand. Referring to dogs and elephants if you are wonderful.

···································································

审查制度应该被禁止有很多原因：一是人们没有权利仅仅因为他们认为这会对我们有很大的影响就把书或电影禁了。每个作家都应该像其他人一样有权表达自己的想法和观点，不应该被批评。但是这是你自己的选择同意或不同意作者的意见

Censorship ought to be banned for many reasons 1 is that people have no right to burn books or ban movies just because they think it might have a big effect on us. every writer should have the right to express his thoughts and opinions just like everyone else and shall not be criticized about it. however it is your choice about weather to agree or disagree with the writer.

···································································

自由古巴..自由古巴

Free Cuba... Cuba Libre...