威灵顿公爵(The Duke of Wellington)——欧美历届十大军事将领

威灵顿公爵(The Duke of Wellington)——欧美历届十大军事将领在《欧美历届十大军事将领》中排名第33名。我们精选了部分网友观点： Wellington defeated Napoleon! He...

威灵顿公爵欧美历届十大军事将领在欧美历届十大军事将领中排名第33名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

Wellington defeated Napoleon! He rarely fought if he was going to lose and when he won he won big, when he suffered a defeat it he made sure it was small (that he was undefeated is not true). He possessed self awareness not common in great Generals and absolute clear dispassionate judgement. He managed up to his sceptical parliament and made the best of the meagre resources allowed by them. He may lack the flair of some of the others in this list but his attention to detail, logistical mind and level headedness made sure he was fully successful in his campaigns and that still has its impact on Europe today.

···································································

他的战术思想更广泛的思考不仅仅是战斗。托雷斯的Vedras例如,他知道他不可能击败法国军队在正面战场半岛,所以在国家保密3防御强化行构建保护里斯本和焦土政策后,法国被迫全面撤退与他们通过饥饿和疾病的痛苦无数伤亡。尽管他在葡萄牙和西班牙打了很多胜仗,惠灵顿表示,他最大的胜利是在Assaye在印度,1803年,他约000名男性和17个大炮对50岁的000名男性和100名炮。努力战斗的胜利从一个英国最伟大的将军。

He had a tactical mind that was wider thinking than just the battle at hand. The Lines of Torres Vedras for example, he knew that he could not defeat the French Peninsular army in open battle, so under state secrecy had 3 defensive fortification lines constructed to protect Lisbon and following a scorched earth policy, forced the French into full retreat with them suffering numerous casualties through starvation and disease. Despite his many victories in Portugal and Spain, Wellington stated that his greatest victory was that at Assaye in India, 1803, where he had roughly 10, 000 men and 17 cannon against 50, 000 men with 100 cannon. A hard fought victory from one of Britain's greatest generals.

···································································

据我所知,惠灵顿是唯一一般在这个名单上击败了其他版本,但他比被他征服的对手再。60战不败的十五年,是他无可救药地数量,无疑是一个令人印象深刻的记录。这第四富有的爱尔兰土地所有者的儿子参军,因为它被认为他永远不会达到任何东西,但他是唯一一个韦尔斯利家族的任何水平的名声。简单的将军和绝对应该在前十。

As far as I can tell, Wellington is the only General on this list to have defeated any of the others, and yet he is further down the list than his vanquished opponent. 60 battles undefeated over a period of fifteen years, where mostly he was hopelessly outnumbered, is an undeniably impressive record. This fourth son of a wealthy Irish land owner joined the military as it was believed he would never amount to anything - and yet he is the only one of the Wellesley family who has any level of fame. Simply phenomenal general and should definitely be in the top ten.

···································································

我喜欢他比拿破仑。确定拿破仑军事可能更有经验,最好的策略,但我更喜欢惠灵顿的方面。他很聪明,学习他的对手好,更好的战略家和卑微的拿破仑将军导致他在法国许多胜利。拿破仑相比他从未犯过严重错误或可怕的错误。他仔细事实上学会了从错误中学习和思想更好的从他的损失。

I prefer him better than Napoleon. Sure Napoleon may be more militarily experienced and had better tactics but I like Wellington's aspects better. He was smarter, studies his opponents well, better strategist and out-thought most of Napoleon's generals which lead him to many victories over the French. Compared to Napoleon he never made any serious blunders or terrible mistakes. He infact learns from his mistakes carefully and thought better from his losses.

···································································

韦尔斯利的战斗记录是模范;他参与一些60战斗的过程中他的军事生涯,包括,但不限于,Seringapatam和Assaye在印度,维多利亚在西班牙,,嗯…是的,滑铁卢!韦尔斯利自适应风格著称的战争,导致几对数值比军队的胜利,而减少自己的损失。他是,毫无疑问,最伟大的指挥官之一,和他的许多战术和作战计划仍在世界各地的军事院校学习。

Wellesley's battle record is exemplary; He participated in some 60 battles during the course of his military career, including, but not limited to, Seringapatam and Assaye in India, Vitoria in Spain, and, umm... Oh yeah, Waterloo! Wellesley is famous for his adaptive style of warfare, which resulted in several victories against numerically superior forces, while minimizing his own losses. He is, without doubt, one of the greatest commanders of all time, and many of his tactics and battle plans are still studied in military academies around the world.

···································································

击败拿破仑和他的同事,继承英国军队结构、纪律、物流、经常数量,不可靠的盟友,欣赏他的军队,尽管声誉不同他的战术视情况而定,只有亚历山大显然更好,同行包括拿破仑,马尔伯勒,尤金和尤利乌斯•凯撒。几乎没有其他常见的候选人有这样有才华的对手和政治和组织问题。

Beat Napoleon and the rest of his Marshals, re-invented the British Army structure, discipline, logistics, frequently outnumbered, unreliable Allies, admired by his troops, despite reputation varied his tactics depending upon the situation. Only Alexander clearly better, peers include Napoleon, Marlborough, Eugene and Julius Caesar. Almost none of the other common candidates had such talented opponents and had the political and organisational issues.

···································································

虽然拿破仑征服欧洲大部分地区,惠灵顿拿破仑征服了所有的将军们!他应该有点高。

While Napoleon conquered most of Europe, Wellington conquered all of Napoleon's generals!He should have been a bit higher.

···································································

优秀的战术家专家使用土地的碱液。也许是历史上最伟大的防守一般eji大多与数量的军队,还经常不同国籍的塑造成一个强大的力量。真正的他在滑铁卢布吕歇尔的帮助下,但他仍持有法国主要攻击首次被迫撤退的。

Excellent tactician an expert at using the lye of the land. Perhaps the greatest defensive general in history eji mostly fought with outnumbered armies, often of different nationalities yet moulded them into a formidable force. True he was helped by Blucher at Waterloo, but he still held off the main French attack forced the first ever retreat of the Imperial guard.

···································································

真正的一个伟大的将军,他击败了,通过引入游击战,法兰西帝国由拿破仑在拿破仑战争的半岛之战,导致西班牙和葡萄牙的解放。他还最后的打击拿破仑在滑铁卢战役。

Truly one of the greatest generals of all times, he defeated, through introducing guerilla warfare, the French Empire (led by Napoleon) during the Peninsular Campaign of the Napoleonic wars, which led to the liberation of Spain and Portugal. He also dealt the final blow to Napoleon at the battle of Waterloo.

···································································

这难道不是更高吗?可笑的。特别是有非常有限的证据对大卫王实际上存在。负责半岛战争的胜利和在滑铁卢。你想要更多的什么?

How is this not higher? Ludicrous. Especially given there is exceptionally limited evidence for King David having actually existed. Responsible for the victories in the Peninsular War and at Waterloo. What more do you want?