苏丹l-Ẓāhir smi al-Din Baibars al-Bunduqdari(Scipio Africanus)——欧美历届十大军事将领

苏丹l-Ẓāhir smi al-Din Baibars al-Bunduqdari(Scipio Africanus)——欧美历届十大军事将领在《欧美历届十大军事将领》中排名第28名。我们精选了部分网友观点： ...

苏丹欧美历届十大军事将领在欧美历届十大军事将领中排名第28名。

·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点：

···································································

让我们不要忘记,汉尼拔只有在他最好的时候他决定战斗的条件,,,等。此外,汉尼拔的长寿是由于他故意避免战斗。现在通常当你发号施令,选择战斗,基本上樱桃挑选一个战争,那将是令人震惊的是否汉尼拔持续了不到他did.Scipio不仅要做的可能超越最聪明的激战,实际上他必须打败他。这两个与天赋,他昂首阔步,和信心。我看到的不是一个壮举超越。西皮奥操纵主机械手,拉下裤子,一旦发现与大占了上风。

Let's not forget, Hannibal was only at his best when HE dictated the conditions of the battle--where, when, etc... Furthermore, Hannibal's longevity was due to his intentional avoidance of battle. Now typically when you get to call the shots, pick and choose battles, and essentially cherry pick a war, it would be shocking if Hannibal lasted any less than he did.Scipio not only had to do the impossible of outsmarting the smartest into a pitched battle, he had to actually defeat him. Both of which he did with flair, swagger, and confidence. A feat I see as of yet not surpassed. Scipio manipulated the master manipulator, and once caught with his pants down, the greater general prevailed.

···································································

如何你不把非洲西皮奥在最好的将军。他defited古代历史上最好的将军。他总罗马军队改革策略…短剑…队列…。你可以研究ilipa 206因为. .的我希望你把非洲西皮奥唯一最好的…他打赌汉尼拔巴萨古代历史最伟大的将军。这是我的第二个请求,你把西皮奥amoghest最好的将军和你没有. .你怎么你把skanderberg和Scipip甚至没有提到. .你. .我的电子邮件是如何giusepperaimondo@ hotmail.com . .我等待响应. .最好把朱塞佩

How there you don' t put scipio Africanus among best general... He defited the best general in ancient history... He made a total Roman army reform... Tactics... The gladius... Cohort... Maneuver.. And you can study ilipa 206 because... At ones I want you put Scipio Africanus the one and only greates general of all the time... He beted Hannibal barca the greatest general of ancient history... This is my second request that you put scipio amoghest the best general and you didn't... How there you you put skanderberg and Scipip is not even mention... How there you... My email is giusepperaimondo@ hotmail.com... I ' waiting for a responds... The best regard giuseppe

···································································

汉尼拔是罗马城外五英里;巨大的政治压力存在西皮奥汉尼拔在意大利作战。相反,西皮奥了军事和政治天才,去非洲攻击迦太基,导致汉尼拔离开意大利。聪明。西皮奥打败汉尼拔,罗马的卓越。他是仅次于亚历山大。

Hannibal was five miles outside the city of Rome; intense political pressure existed for Scipio to fight Hannibal in Italy. Instead, Scipio demonstrated military and political genius, going to Africa to attack Carthage, causing Hannibal to leave Italy. Brilliant. Scipio beat Hannibal, launching Rome's preeminence. He's second only to Alexander.

···································································

军事历史的学生我很震惊美国上市的非洲如此之低,他赢得了第二次布匿战争。他积极超过17年,从未打过败仗。他击败了汉尼拔在扎马而略比。他是一个政治家。许多你在他面前有微小的贡献的比较列表。他必须高于汉尼拔。

As a student of military history I was appalled to find S. Africanus listed so low. He won the Second Punic War. He was active for more than 17 years and NEVER lost a battle. He defeated Hannibal at Zama while slightly outnumbered. He was a statesman as well. Many of those you have before him in the list have contributions that are miniscule by comparison. He has to be higher than Hannibal.

···································································

布拉沃亲爱的朋友. .知道历史的人

Bravo my dear friends... Someone that knows about history

···································································

51岁,真的吗?他可能是最好的军事指挥官。他不只是打败汉尼拔,可以说是历史上第二个最好的将军。他打败了一切,每个人都对他发送。西班牙征服者,和历史上为数不多的不败将军。

51, really? He is probably the best military commander of all time. He didn't JUST defeat Hannibal, who is arguably the 2nd best general in History. He defeated EVERYTHING and EVERYONE sent against him. Conqueror of Spain, and one of the few undefeated generals in history.

···································································

不仅是西皮奥不败在战斗中,他实现了他的胜利,他是一个伟大的战略家。在西班牙,他设法克服3迦太基军队都超过他。和在非洲在大平原和扎马偏离标准罗马三行显示他的战术。

Not only was Scipio undefeated in battle, it was the way in which he achieved he's victories that makes him a great strategist. In Hispania he managed to overcome 3 Carthaginian armies that all outnumbered him. And in Africa at the Battle of the Great Plains and Zama his deviation from the standard Roman triple line showed his tactical Nouse.

···································································

可能他没有赢得汉尼拔罗马从来没有存在过,没有欧洲的罗马文化,正如我们所知,没有欧洲从未出生,这个世界将会完全different.Without他的皮拉尔斯通这世界文化将迦太基。

Might he have not win Hannibal Rome would have never existed, without the roman culture Europe, as we know it, would have never been born, without Europe this world would be totally different.Without him our pilar stone of this world culture would be Carthage.

···································································

他不应高于汉尼拔因为他刚刚发现如何使用罗马的大军队和供应自己的优势。罗马/ 2年才找到人不是愚蠢的匹配与汉尼拔的一半。

He should not be higher than Hannibal because he just figured out how to use Rome's greater army and supplies to his own advantage. It took Rome over 2 decades to find someone who wasn't half stupid to match against Hannibal.

Scipio Africanus if not considered better than his greatest adversary, should at least be ranked near him. To defeat the mighty Hannibal Barca is no easy feat. Additionally this man does not lose!