情报(Intelligence)——欧美人生最重要的十件事

情报(Intelligence)——欧美人生最重要的十件事 在 《欧美人生最重要的十件事》 中排名第32名。 LemonComputer,只是因为身体和躯体上我们进化的方式像动物一样并不意味着我们等于动物。在心理和社会进化的方式,和动物只是因为适应不断变化的环境。我不相信一个活着的理论,但我也不相信进化论只是因为这两个理论不能被证明是...

情报欧美人生最重要的十件事在欧美人生最重要的十件事中排名第32名。


LemonComputer,只是因为身体和躯体上我们进化的方式像动物一样并不意味着我们等于动物。在心理和社会进化的方式,和动物只是因为适应不断变化的环境。我不相信一个活着的理论,但我也不相信进化论只是因为这两个理论不能被证明是准确的验证,因此不确定性。我没有答案来解释生活真的开始没有人。所有的理论都是投机的但我相信动物和人类完全是两个物种,因为在soma ++心理的差异。所以,我认为你是对的的演变只是物理的部分。 LemonComputer;我谈论一些主观和经验,分享信息和谈论它。动物不能分享他们的主观经验和肯定不会谈论它。动物本能的行动,我没有说100�20来显示他们的主观情绪或冲动行为。这是一个客观事实,第二;你说我们不会称自己为动物只是因为我们的自我?这就像说,狗不是动物,仅仅因为我们称之为狗?在动物这个词有很明显的类别不同的物种,所以我不理解你的逻辑评论。我们也可以对人类做出类别种族、颜色等。但它仍然是一个类别的人类和类别的动物分离。和evollving喜欢我们进化的像鸡吗?或许多其他动物吗?验证中。这是一个事实,人类与所有子类别和动物. .有更多 动物和人类有很大的区别只是说的事实,我们有能力或者认为我们动物或不是已经改变。如果没有区别我们为什么要使用+ u2018人类+ u2018这个词而不是动物。一些科学家说,我们是理性的动物但是其他科学家不喜欢使用这句话。这一事实我们可以讨论这个话题的证明是一个分离的物种。

·······································································


·······································································

我们精选了部分网友观点:

···································································


LemonComputer,只是因为身体和躯体上我们进化的方式像动物一样并不意味着我们等于动物。在心理和社会进化的方式,和动物只是因为适应不断变化的环境。我不相信一个活着的理论,但我也不相信进化论只是因为这两个理论不能被证明是准确的验证,因此不确定性。我没有答案来解释生活真的开始没有人。所有的理论都是投机的但我相信动物和人类完全是两个物种,因为在soma ++心理的差异。所以,我认为你是对的的演变只是物理的部分。


LemonComputer, just because we evolved on a physical and somatic way like animals doesn't mean that we're equal to animals. We evolved on a psychologic and social manner as well, and animals just adapted themselves because of changing circumstances. I don't believe in a god-created theory but I don't believe in the evolution theory either just because those two theories can't be proven with exact verifications and therefor with no certitude. I don't have the answers to explain how life really began ( nobody does. All theories are speculative in that matter ) but I believe that animals and humans are two completely species because of the difference in the soma / psych. So, I think you're right about the evolvement but only for the physical part.

···································································


LemonComputer;我谈论一些主观和经验,分享信息和谈论它。动物不能分享他们的主观经验和肯定不会谈论它。动物本能的行动,我没有说100�20来显示他们的主观情绪或冲动行为。这是一个客观事实,第二;你说我们不会称自己为动物只是因为我们的自我?这就像说,狗不是动物,仅仅因为我们称之为狗?在动物这个词有很明显的类别不同的物种,所以我不理解你的逻辑评论。我们也可以对人类做出类别种族、颜色等。但它仍然是一个类别的人类和类别的动物分离。和evollving喜欢我们进化的像鸡吗?或许多其他动物吗?验证中。这是一个事实,人类与所有子类别和动物. .有更多


LemonComputer ; I'm talking about experience something subjective and share that information and talk about it. Animals can't share their subjective experience and certainly not talk about it. Animals act by instinct ( and I didn't say 100%! ) OR by impulsive acts to show their subjective emotions. And that's an objective fact. Second ; you're saying that we will not call ourselves animals just because of our egos? That it is like saying that dogs aren't animals just because we call them dogs? In the word animals there are obviousely categories of different species, so I don't understand your logic about that comment. We can also make categories about humans ( race, color etc... ) but it's still a separation of categories of humans and categories of animals. And about the evollving like them ( are we evolving like chickens? Or many other animal species for that matter? ). It's a fact in verifications that humans ( with all there sub-categories ) and animals ( with all there ... more

···································································


动物和人类有很大的区别只是说的事实,我们有能力或者认为我们动物或不是已经改变。如果没有区别我们为什么要使用+ u2018人类+ u2018这个词而不是动物。一些科学家说,我们是理性的动物但是其他科学家不喜欢使用这句话。这一事实我们可以讨论这个话题的证明是一个分离的物种。


There's a huge difference between animals and humans ( just the fact that we are capable of saying or thinking that we're animals or not makes already a difference.). If there was no difference why should we use the word " human " instead animal. Some scientists says that we're rational animals but other scientists don't like to use that statement. Just the fact that we can discuss this topic is proof of a separation of the species.

···································································


这就像是说狗不是动物因为我们称之为狗。当然我们不会称自己为一个动物,我们与巨大的自我。——LemonComputer生物


That's like saying that dogs aren't animals because we call them dogs. Of course we're not going to call ourselves an animal, we're creatures with huge egos. - LemonComputer

···································································


你猜错了!我是个无神论者,但我相信在科学精确的科学,准确的说,人类不同于动物的DNA的DNA。所以,当改变发生在一个类别的伪造至少有两个不同的category-facts。人类不能被动物当a + B验证不同。响应的评论IronSabbathPriest谁猜我宗教!。


You guessed wrong! I'm an atheist. But I believe in exact science. And exact science says that DNA of humans are different than the DNA of animals. So, when a difference occurs in a category of falsification there's at least two different category-facts. Humans can't be animals when A plus B are different verifications. ( Response against the comment of IronSabbathPriest who guesses I'm religious! ).

···································································


我们不是动物。因为一些科学家这样说并不意味着这是一个事实。人类可以体验和分享他们的主观经验与其他人类。动物没有权力来表达自己的主观经验。动物本能或冲动行为。这就是人类从动物分离。


We are not animals. Because some scientists says so doesn't mean that this is a fact. Humans can experience and share their subjective experiences with other humans. Animals don't have the power to express their subjective experiences. Animals just act by instinct or by impulse. That's what separates the humans from the animals.

···································································


我们动物因为我们进化就像他们銆�同时,代理100�本能只适用于简单的生物体,这主要是bug銆�- LemonComputer


We're animals because we evolved just like them. Also, acting 100% on instinct only goes for simple minded organisms, which are mainly bugs. - LemonComputer

···································································


智慧是人类应该have.But一些有更多和less.If你有更多的,你会有更多advantage.But我们不能选择我们有多少智慧,所以不要强迫自己。


Intelligence is something humans should have.But some has more and some has less.If you have more,you will have more advantage.But we cannot choose how much intelligence we have,so don't force yourself.

···································································


不是情报分享知识的能力?我投票。- LemonComputer知识


Isn't intelligence the ability to share knowledge? I voted knowledge instead. - LemonComputer

···································································


智能是智能u areKnowledge是多少你知道和体会——JohnPierre88


Intellegence is how smart u areKnowledge is how much u know and have exprience - JohnPierre88

  • 发表于 2020-12-01 06:10
  • 阅读 ( 499 )
  • 分类:生活

你可能感兴趣的文章

相关问题

0 条评论

请先 登录 后评论
admin
admin

0 篇文章

作家榜 »

  1. xiaonan123 189 文章
  2. 汤依妹儿 97 文章
  3. luogf229 46 文章
  4. jy02406749 45 文章
  5. 小凡 34 文章
  6. Daisy萌 32 文章
  7. 我的QQ3117863681 24 文章
  8. 华志健 23 文章

推荐文章

联系我们:uytrv@hotmail.com 问答工具